Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Newsletters  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations

 
 

Salon.com

[Arts & Entertainment][ Books ][ Comics ][ Mothers Who Think ][ News ][ People ][ Politics ][ Sex ][ Technology ][ Audio ]

Article Finder
Books Review


 


"Cloning: Responsible Science or Technomadness?"
A new book shows that ethical questions about replicating humans are less consequential than the procedure's threat to our biological diversity.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Michael Scott Moore

Jan. 4, 2001 | "When I first heard about cloning," wrote William Burroughs in a late essay called "Immortality," "I thought what a fruitful concept, why one could be in a hundred places at once and experience everything the other clones did. I am amazed at the outcry against this good thing not only from Men of the Cloth but from scientists ... The very thought of a clone disturbs these learned gentlemen. Like cattle on the verge of stampede they paw the ground mooing apprehensively, 'Selfness is an essential fact of life. The thought of human non-selfness is terrifying.'"

It's hard to say if Burroughs is being funny here, because he's certainly full of it. Cloning cannot create armies of consciousnesses tuned in to some central brain. It also won't undermine individuality, as his imaginary Men of the Cloth worry, by printing cheap replicas of somebody's precious individual character. This is point No. 1 in any debate about cloning. The process just copies a genome, and poses no worse a threat to the human sense of self than does any identical twin.



Cloning: Responsible Science or Technomadness?

Edited by Michael Ruse and Aryne Sheppard

Prometheus Books
301 pages
Nonfiction


amazon.com



Print story


E-mail story


View Salon privately with SafeWeb


From there things get complicated, though, and a new anthology of articles on the subject is meant to help navigate this weird, still-uncharted moral territory. "Cloning: Responsible Science or Technomadness?" wants to be a complete overview of the debate so far, mixing religious declarations with philosophical arguments, scientific findings and governmental decrees; the original Nature article on Dolly the sheep even shares space in these pages with a (very bad) story by Douglas Coupland.

The writers brood over the question of individuality and self in the aftermath of Dolly's birth in 1997. So far the debate relies on language borrowed from older arguments, like the ones over abortion or slavery. Whether you're for or against human cloning in the abstract seems to depend, right now, on whether you're pro-life or pro-choice. And almost every philosophical writer in the book refers to Immanuel Kant, who (in the context of slavery) insisted on treating all people as "ends in themselves, not as means to an end."

So, the philosophers ask, what would Kant think of cloning? Answers fall into categories. Some writers can't get past the sickness of the idea of replicating a person. They insist that anyone intentionally cloned, for whatever reason (vanity, infertility, minor body-part transplants), would live under a psychological cloud. "The cloned individual will be saddled with a genotype that has already lived," writes Leon Kass, an ethicist at the University of Chicago who leads the anti-cloning charge. "He will not be fully a surprise to the world."

. Next page | A whiff of religion
1, 2





 



Don't get sunburned!  Cover up with a Salon T-shirt this summer.




Extra goodies and great services in
Salon Plus

____
 




 
 
____
 
   
 
____
 
  Current Stories
  • "Winnie and Wolf" What if Hitler had a love child? A.N. Wilson's "Winnie and Wolf" is a chilling fictional tale of a clandestine affair.
    By James Hannaham
  • Beyond rescue As his book "Why We Suck" hits the shelves, Denis Leary talks about lazy parenting, the media storm surrounding his views on autism, and the omnipotence of Oprah.
    By Heather Havrilesky
  • Malcolm Gladwell's secrets of success Bill Gates and the Beatles owe their genius to nurture not nature, argues the acclaimed "Tipping Point" author. It's a nice theory.
    By Louis Bayard
  • Why "Scarface" is f-ing great De Palma's '80s cult classic is trash, many scoff. But the lowdown, seedy movie with Al Pacino as a Cuban thug influenced pop culture from gangsta rap to "Miami Vice."
    By Louis Bayard
  •  

    shim shim shim shim shim shim shim
    shim
    shim

    Maya Angelou reads from "The Heart of a Woman"

    shim
    shim



    Salon  Search  About Salon  Table Talk  Newsletters  Advertise in Salon  Investor Relations


    Arts & Entertainment | Books | Comics | Mothers Who Think | News
    People | Politics | Sex | Tech & Business and The Free Software Project
    Letters | Columnists | Salon Plus | Salon Shop


    Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited
    Copyright 2005 Salon.com


    Salon, 22 4th Street, 16th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103
    Telephone 415 645-9200 | Fax 415 645-9204
    E-mail | Salon.com Privacy Policy